Abbott, B. (2010). Reference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Albert, H. (1985). Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
Allwood, J., Andersson, L. G. & Dahl, Ö. (1977). Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Anscombre, J., & Ducrot, O. (1983). L’argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: P. Mardaga.
Aristotle (2007) On Rhetoric (George A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Austin, J. L. (1970). Performative Utterances. In Austin, J. L., Philosophical Papers, pp. 233-252. London: Oxford University Press
Amossy, R. (2005). The argumentative dimension of discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.). Argumentation in Practice. (pp. 87-99). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793-826.
Arnauld, A. & Nicole, P. (1683). La Logique ou l’Art de penser. (5th ed.) Paris: Desperez
Bach, E. (1989). Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. New York: State University of New York Press.
Bach, K. (1991). Referential/Attributive. In S. Davis, (Ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader. (pp. 17-33) New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bach, K. (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In B. Birner & G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, (pp. 21–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barth, E. M. & Krabbe, E. C. (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue. New York: De Gruyter.
Burke, M. (1985). Unstated Premises, Informal Logic, 7(2), 44-56
Booth, W. (2004). The Rhetoric of Rhetoric. Blackwell Publishing, MA, Oxford UK
Bergson, H. (1924). Le Rire: Essai sur la signification du comique. Paris: Alcan
Campbell, G. (1834). The Philosophy of Rhetoric, New York: Jona Leavit, Jos. B. Collins et al.
Cann, R. (1993). Formal semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Carlson, G. (1977). A Unified Analysis of English Bare Plurals. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 413-357.
Carlson, G. (1980). Reference to Kinds in English. New York/London: Garland Publishing.
Carlson, G. (1982). Generic Terms and Generic Sentences. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11, 145-181
Carlson, G. (1995). Truth Conditions of Generic Sentences: Two Contrasting Views. In K. Manfred & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, G. (2004). Reference. In H. Laurence & W. Gregory, (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. (pp. 74-97). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing
Carston, Robyn (1988) “Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics”, Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, edited by Ruth Kempson, Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Davis, S. (Ed.). (1991) Pragmatics: A Reader. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33- 52
Cassin, B. (Ed.). (1986). Le plaisir de parler – etudes de sophistique comparée, Paris: Les Editions de Minuit
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton
Church, A. (1940). A formulation of a simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5, 56-68.
Cicero. (1967) De oratore (E. W. Sutton, H. Rackman, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Copelston, F. (1994). A history of philosophy: Modern philosophy – From Descartes to Leibniz [Vol. IV]. New York/London: Image books
Colston H. L & Gibbs, R. (Eds.). (2007). Irony in Language and Thought. New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Dahl, O. (1975). On Generics. In E. L. Keenan (Ed.). Formal Semantics in Natural Language, pp. 99-111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, O. (1985). Remarques sur la generique. Langages, 79(20), 55-60
Davis, S. (Ed.). (1991) Pragmatics: A Reader. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press
Declerck, R. (1986). The Manifold Interpretation of Generic Sentences. Lingua, 68, 149-188
Donnellan, Keith. (1966). Reference and Definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, In Davis, S. (Ed.). (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52-65
Ducrot, O. (2009) Slovenian Lectures. Ljubljana: Pedagoski Institut.
Eemeren, F. H. van, (1992) Argumentation studies’ five estates. In Idem. Benoit, W. L, Hample D. & Benoit P. J. Readings in argumentation, (pp. 615-654) Berlin/New York: Foris/de Gruyter.
Eemeren, F. H. van et al. (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eemeren, F. H. van (Ed.). (2001). Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Universtiy Press
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht-Holland: Foris Publications.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies – A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscalosa/London: University of Alabama Press.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1997). Rhetorical rationales for dialectical moves. In J. Klumpp (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 51–56). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1998). Rhetoric in pragma-dialectics. Armenian Mind, 2(1), 24–44.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999a). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479–497.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999b). William the Silent’s argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp.168–171). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2000a). Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. The case of R. J. Reynolds. Argumentation, 14(3), 293–305.
Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2007). The Contextuality of Fallacies. Informal Logic, 27(1), 59-67.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P., Ihnen, C. & Marcn, L. (2010). Contextual considerations in the evaluation of argumentation. In C. Tindale & C. Ried (Eds.) Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning and Argument. London: College Publications
Ennis, R. H. (1982). Identifying Implicit Assumptions. Synthese, 51, 61-68
Frege, G. (1892). Sense and Refernce. (Max Black, Trans.). Retrieved from: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Sense_and_Reference
Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Logic, language and Meaning. Vol 1: Introduction to Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Gardiner, A. H. (1932). The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Gazdar, G. J. (1979). Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
Groake, L. (1992). In defense of deductivism: replying to Govier. In F. H. van Eemeren et al. (Eds.), Argumentation Illuminated, (pp. 113-121). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Gerritsen, S. (2001). Unexpressed Premises. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.) Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gorgias (1972) The Encomium of Helen. In. R. K. Sprague (Ed.) The Older Sophists (pp. 50-54). Retrieved from: http://www.phil.vt.edu/MGifford/phil2115/Helen.htm
Goulding, D. J. (1965). Aristotle’s Concept of the Enthymeme. Journal of the American Forensic Society, 2, 104-108.
Govier, T. (1985). A Practical Study of Argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth,
Govier, T. (1987). The problem of missing premises. In Problems in argument analysis and evaluation, (pp. 81-104). Berlin: Foris/Mouton de Gruyter
Govier, T. (1995). Reply to Massey. In H. V. Hansen & R. C. Pinto (Eds.), Fallacies: Classical Background and Contemporary Developments, pp. 172-180. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press
Grice, P. H. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66(3), pp. 377-388
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics. (pp. 41-58). London/New York, NY: Academic Press
Grice, P. H. (1989). Studies in The Way of Words. London: Harvard University Press,
Grice, P. H. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation.” In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 9. Pragmatics (pp. 113–128). New York: Academic.
Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Newport, VA: Vale Press.
Hansen, H. V. & Pinto, R. C. (Eds.). (1995). Fallacies: Classical Background and Contemporary Developments. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press
Heim, I. & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Hitchcock, D. (1985). Enthymematic arguments. Informal Logic, 7(2), 87-99
Hitchcock, D. (2003). Toulmin’s Warrants. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. Blair, C. Willard & A. F. Snoeck-Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, pp. 69-82. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jackson, S. (1986). Building a Case for Claims About Discourse Structure. In D.G. Ellis & W.A. Donohane (Eds.). Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse. (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Johnson, R. H. (1981). Charity Begins at Home. Informal Logic Newsletter, 3, 14-20
Johnson, R. H. (1990). Hamblin on The Standard Treatment. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 23(3),University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press
Johnson, R. H. (1991). In Response To Walton. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 24(4), : The Pennsylvania State University
Kaplan, David. (1978). On the Logic of Demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 81-89
Kempson, R. M. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S.,& Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–12.
Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. In Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., and Howard Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Volume II: Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Morris, MN: University of Minnesota, 255–76.
Krikfa, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., Alice, M., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (Eds.)(1995). Genericity: An introduction. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–124.
Lawler, J. M. (1972). Generic to a Fault. Chicago Linguistic Society, 8, 247-258
Lawler, J. M. (1973). Tracking the Generic Toad. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 320-331
Levi, Don S., (1995). The Case of the Missing Premise. Informal Logic, 17(1), 80-99
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 66-100). Cambridge: University Press (originally published in 1979, Linguistics, 17, 5/6, pp. 356-399)
Linsky, L. (Ed.). (1971). Reference and Modality. London: Oxford University Press
Makin, G. (2000). The Metaphysicians of Meaning: Russell and Frege On Sense and Denotation, Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. in Richmond Thomason (Ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. (pp. 222-224). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Montague, R. (1974). Formal Philosophy. New Heaven, CN: Yale University Press.
Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Massey, G. J. (1995). The Fallacy behind Fallacies. In H. V. Hansen & R. C. Pinto (Eds.), Fallacies: Classical Background and Contemporary Developments, pp. 159-171. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press
Partee, B. H. (Ed.). (1976). Montague Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Partee, B. (2004). Compositionality in formal semantics: Selected papers, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Partee, B., Ter Meulen, A., & Wall, R. E. (1990). Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pelletier, F. J. (Ed.) (2010). Kinds, Things, and Stuff. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Perelman, C. (1989). La Methode dialectique et le role de l'interlocuteur dans le dialogue. In C. Perelman (Ed.). Rhetoriques. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles,
Perelman, C., (1955). Dialectique et dialogue. In C. Perelman (Ed.) Rhetoriques, Editions de L'Université de Bruxelles, 1989
Perelman, C. (Ed.) (1989) Rhetoriques, Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l'argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de L'Universite de Bruxelles.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press
Plato (1989). Gorgias. (Terence Irving, Trans., 3rd ed.) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London/New York: Routledge
Popper, K. (1978). La connaissance objective, Bruxelles : Editions Complexes
Quine, W. V. (1967). Russell’s ontological development. In Schoenman, R. (Ed.) Bertrand Russell, Philosopher of the Century, pp. 304-311. New York: Allen & Unwin
Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479-493
Russell, B. (1946) A History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Russell, B. (2009) The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. R. Egner & Lester D. (Eds.), New York/London/Toronto: Routledge Inc.
Recanati, F. (1989). Referential/Attributive: A contextualist approach. Philosophical Studies, 56, 217-249
Recanati, F. (1991). The Pragmatics of What is Said. In D. Steven (Ed.). Pragmatics: A Reader. (pp. 52-65), New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America. (pp. 221-239). London: Allen & Unwin
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay In The Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Searle, J. (1979a). Referential and Attributive. Monist, 62, 190-208
Searle, J. (1979b). Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech acts, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Uniersity Press
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use–mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.),
Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deidre (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53–76.
Tindale, C. (2004) Rhetorical Argumentation. London: Sage Publications.
Tindale, C. W., (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Verschueren, J. (2009). Introduction: The pragmatic perspective. In J. Verschueren & J.-O., Ostman, Handbook of pragmatic highlights, Vol. 1: Key notions for pragmatics, (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Verschueren, J. & Ostman, J.-O. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of pragmatic highlights, Vol. 1: Key notions for pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Wagemans, J. (2011). The assessment of argumentation from expert opinion. Argumentation 25, 329–339
Walton, D. (1983). Enthymemes. Logique et Analyse, 5, 103-104.
Walton, D., (1991). Hamblin on The Standard Treatment of Fallacies. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 24(4), University Park, PA: State University Press.
Walton, D. (1992). Types of Dialogue, Dialectal Shifts and Fallacies. F. H. van Eemeren et al. (Eds.) Argumentation Illuminated, (p. 133-147) Amsterdam: SICSAT.
Walton, D. & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Walton, D. (1995) Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory, Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Walton, D. (2001). Enthymemes, Common Knowledge, and Plausible Inference. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34(2), 46-66 .
Walton, D. (2004). Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument. Argumentation, 18, 359–368.
Walton, D. (2006a). Fundamentals in Argumentation Theory. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press
Walton, D. (2006b). Examination dialogue: A framework for critically questioning an expert opinion. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 745–777.Walton, D. (2007a) Media Argumentation: Di.alectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric. New York/ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (2007b) Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Walton, D. (2007c). Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Relevance and Textual Congruity. Anthropology & Philosophy: International Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 101-119.
Wilson, D. (1994). Relevance and understanding. In G. Brown et al. (Eds.) Language and understanding (pp. 35-59). Oxford: University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1975) On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. (4th Edition, 2009). Oxford: Blackwell.
Woodridge, M. (2002) An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Wreen, M. (1995) Begging the Question: Circular reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 28, 2.
